Dee ranteth politically. Take cover.
All right, so there's this stupid bint in
The Australian today, writing about
the prisoners in Camp X-Ray. (For those with their heads under rocks - I wish I was with you - Camp X-Ray is in Cuba, and is where the US is stashing their Afghani prisoners, in conditions that don't quite measure up to the Geneva Convention.) Now, this is an issue about which simply opening your mouth is a good way to get me to argue with you. The right-wing vigilante hardliners annoy me. The bleeding-heart humanitarians annoy me. But this silly woman practically made me froth with wrath right into my cornflakes. I simply can't believe she's missed the point so entirely.
To details. She was arguing that, from a legal and occasionally logical standpoint, these terrorist prisoners don't have any rights in general or under the Geneva convention. She trots out a lot of evidence (and even some 'evidence' - quotation marks indicating dubious nature) and she might even be right. I really don't give a shit. That's not the point.
The point is not whether they should be classed as true POWs because of the methods they use and intentions they have. The point is about laying any sort of claim to superiority, to the
right to persecute anyone in some other part of the world. The United States makes those claims. It claims to be superior, to have the right to be the world's watchdog, its big brother, its protector. If it wants it, it
bloody well has to act like it deserves it. That means not pouting, saying "They would have done it", hiding behind legalistic nitpickings of wording or trying to wangle their way out of their fucking responsibilities. Jesus. Grow up!
(Note, here, that I really don't give a flying fuck about human rights, about "building a better world" or any of that tripe. But on that note, the hypocrisy is mind-boggling. Listen, American wankers: when you start bleating about "human rights",
you don't get to redefine 'human' to suit your purposes. After all, in mid-20th-century Germany, Jews weren't human, so who really gave a damn about their rights.
Are we getting the fucking point yet??)
To round off this uber-rant, I'd like to pick on a few more of the twit's points. Specifically, her problems with sections 17 (under which prisoners are not allowed to be interrogated) and 118 (under which they are repatriated) of the Convention. Her issues with sections are
precisely the same as the issues with them in any normal conflict. In
any conflict, you'd like to interrogate your prisoners to find out what the enemy's intending. In
any conflict, you don't want to let the soldiers go back to the armies they came from. But it's the
rules of engagement and that's why there's a fucking Geneva Convention in the first place. You start violating it for "special cases" and pretty soon
everything's a "special case" and why bother having the stupid document anyway.
Return to refrain: Grow up, America. Reconcile your role. You can't do precisely as you please and try to be the leader of the world. Either you accept your responsibilities, or you waive your rights. Every teenager in the world realises this eventually. It's time you did too.